|
|
Post by ashes on May 17, 2009 19:49:36 GMT -5
This is hilarious.
|
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 17, 2009 19:50:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 17, 2009 19:51:42 GMT -5
Arroyo is getting beat up today. Just call it a night you just keep digging yourself deeper LOL, considering I had to somehow explain how other PG's are better and considering your rant was pretty much in vein and you had little to no response to my posts, I'd say you were the one getting beat up!  I'm starting to think you have mental issues or are on drugs. You've had no logical responses and have defended your actions blindly. I've offered plenty of alternative options that you could have looked into instead of trading the #1 and #2 projected picks plus more picks for a player who plays a position you didn't need to improve upon. Yet you still have a glaring need for a PG. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on May 17, 2009 19:54:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 17, 2009 19:56:09 GMT -5
de·lu·sion (d-lzhn) n. 1. a. The act or process of deluding. b. The state of being deluded. 2. A false belief or opinion: labored under the delusion that success was at hand. 3. Psychiatry A false belief strongly held in spite of invalidating evidence, especially as a symptom of mental illness: delusions of persecution. |
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 17, 2009 20:08:23 GMT -5
LOL, considering I had to somehow explain how other PG's are better and considering your rant was pretty much in vein and you had little to no response to my posts, I'd say you were the one getting beat up! I'm starting to think you have mental issues or are on drugs. You've had no logical responses and have defended your actions blindly. I've offered plenty of alternative options that you could have looked into instead of trading the #1 and #2 projected picks plus more picks for a player who plays a position you didn't need to improve upon. Yet you still have a glaring need for a PG. I'm taking cocaine, you got a problem? Anyway, as I've said millions of times I didn't have the luxury to keep them and many of these trade blocks for point guards just popped up and I would have had to make a trade regardless since Dice went down for a big man. I never denied my need for a pg and have admitted my mistake in this thread. |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 17, 2009 20:16:48 GMT -5
I'm starting to think you have mental issues or are on drugs. You've had no logical responses and have defended your actions blindly. I've offered plenty of alternative options that you could have looked into instead of trading the #1 and #2 projected picks plus more picks for a player who plays a position you didn't need to improve upon. Yet you still have a glaring need for a PG. I'm taking cocaine, you got a problem? Anyway, as I've said millions of times I didn't have the luxury to keep them and many of these trade blocks for point guards just popped up and I would have had to make a trade regardless since Dice went down for a big man. I never denied my need for a pg and have admitted my mistake in this thread. What do you mean you didn't have the luxury? You needed to make the playoffs and at the time you were winning and in the playoffs. So why make the deal? Why not let some of the season play out and see what direction teams would be going. Even at worst case scenario, I still would have kept this pick but you could have taken the Piston's to the cleaners with his pick. You could have probably gotten whatever you wanted from him. Then you could have still kept the Clippers #1 projected pick. I don't get how you fail to see any of this logic. Also your cocaine usage explains your quickness to pull the trigger on so many bad trades and rush into things. |
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 17, 2009 20:24:14 GMT -5
I'm taking cocaine, you got a problem? Anyway, as I've said millions of times I didn't have the luxury to keep them and many of these trade blocks for point guards just popped up and I would have had to make a trade regardless since Dice went down for a big man. I never denied my need for a pg and have admitted my mistake in this thread. What do you mean you didn't have the luxury? You needed to make the playoffs and at the time you were winning and in the playoffs. So why make the deal? Why not let some of the season play out and see what direction teams would be going. Even at worst case scenario, I still would have kept this pick but you could have taken the Piston's to the cleaners with his pick. You could have probably gotten whatever you wanted from him. Then you could have still kept the Clippers #1 projected pick. I don't get how you fail to see any of this logic. Also your cocaine usage explains your quickness to pull the trigger on so many bad trades and rush into things. The pistons want Hill and Dice and return, no way would they let me take them to cleaners. Nice of you to use failed logic again. |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 17, 2009 20:26:06 GMT -5
What do you mean you didn't have the luxury? You needed to make the playoffs and at the time you were winning and in the playoffs. So why make the deal? Why not let some of the season play out and see what direction teams would be going. Even at worst case scenario, I still would have kept this pick but you could have taken the Piston's to the cleaners with his pick. You could have probably gotten whatever you wanted from him. Then you could have still kept the Clippers #1 projected pick. I don't get how you fail to see any of this logic. Also your cocaine usage explains your quickness to pull the trigger on so many bad trades and rush into things. The pistons want Hill and Dice and return, no way would they let me take them to cleaners. Nice of you to use failed logic again. You had immense leverage on the Pistons. The deeper into the season and the worse he did the more leverage you gained. You were too impatient and if you didn't follow up on this you're just an idiot. |
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 17, 2009 20:30:00 GMT -5
The pistons want Hill and Dice and return, no way would they let me take them to cleaners. Nice of you to use failed logic again. You had immense leverage on the Pistons. The deeper into the season and the worse he did the more leverage you gained. You were too impatient and if you didn't follow up on this you're just an idiot. Nice, following up with some more vulgar. Too bad it isn't as lucrative as cocaine. Anyway, all of what you're saying is filled with baseless assumptions. Thanks for playing, dumbass. |
|
|
|
Post by martinez on May 17, 2009 20:35:01 GMT -5
no Tim Hardaway this list is a joke.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 17, 2009 20:35:24 GMT -5
You had immense leverage on the Pistons. The deeper into the season and the worse he did the more leverage you gained. You were too impatient and if you didn't follow up on this you're just an idiot. Nice, following up with some more vulgar. Too bad it isn't as lucrative as cocaine. Anyway, all of what you're saying is filled with baseless assumptions. Thanks for playing, dumbass. The Pistons suck + they have talented vets who have value but not for long + they have their future picks = REBUILD You own their pick this year + Pistons rebuilding = whatever you want = leverage you Baseless indeed, I'm the idiot. |
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 17, 2009 20:37:22 GMT -5
Nice, following up with some more vulgar. Too bad it isn't as lucrative as cocaine. Anyway, all of what you're saying is filled with baseless assumptions. Thanks for playing, dumbass. The Pistons suck + they have talented vets who have value but not for long + they have their future picks = REBUILD You own their pick this year + Pistons rebuilding = whatever you want = leverage you Baseless indeed, I'm the idiot. They wanted Dice and Hill in return, it didn't matter if I owned the pick or not. Get it through your head. |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on May 17, 2009 20:41:38 GMT -5
The Pistons suck + they have talented vets who have value but not for long + they have their future picks = REBUILD You own their pick this year + Pistons rebuilding = whatever you want = leverage you Baseless indeed, I'm the idiot. They wanted Dice and Hill in return, it didn't matter if I owned the pick or not. Get it through your head. Do you expect him to just bend over and say rape me? Either way when push came to shove you could have demanded what you wanted and he would have complied. |
|
|
|
Post by arroyo03 on May 17, 2009 20:45:43 GMT -5
They wanted Dice and Hill in return, it didn't matter if I owned the pick or not. Get it through your head. Do you expect him to just bend over and say rape me? Either way when push came to shove you could have demanded what you wanted and he would have complied. Again, baseless assumption. You don't know him and you can't speak for him. |
|
