|
|
Post by Jahallstar on Jul 29, 2009 10:08:28 GMT -5
If this is true +5 to Mobley inside scoring.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Jul 29, 2009 10:19:04 GMT -5
how do you not know who jermey schaap is lol...i tried to be as controversial and creative as possible. I wish some of the other GMs would have added more to their answers I just Googled him. I don't live in the States so how the fuck am I supposed to know who he is? It's like me assuming you know who Adrian Chiles is. Despite you purposely being controversial or whatever, most people are just going to interpret it all as you being an asshole. You just compared Jeremy Schaap(more famous because of his legendary father Dick Schaap) to a guy who has less friends on facebook than I do. www.facebook.com/pages/Adrian-Chiles/15992049102The article is in good fun and it shouldn't be read in a mean spirited tone. It's meant to be light hearted reading and to laugh at ourselves. |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Jul 29, 2009 10:27:14 GMT -5
+5 to Iverson's Long Range Shooting
|
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Jul 29, 2009 10:58:09 GMT -5
Whoa now, everyone gets a +5? When has that ever been the case? Settle down, fellas.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Jul 29, 2009 11:00:35 GMT -5
Whoa now, everyone gets a +5? When has that ever been the case? Settle down, fellas. I don't see why not, everyone's answers were detailed and no one except maybe one or two people gave one liners. |
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Jul 29, 2009 11:15:25 GMT -5
You guys will get points based on Ducky's opinions as usual. Ducky or Ashes anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Jul 29, 2009 11:26:00 GMT -5
Whoa now, everyone gets a +5? When has that ever been the case? Settle down, fellas. So the person who writes 8 sentences + copy + pastes gets 5 points and we don't? |
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Jul 29, 2009 11:29:30 GMT -5
This always happens when there is a roundtable type of article.
I don't see the problem with people who answer the questions getting a 3. It doesn't take long to do, and you get free points for answering some questions. Plus it doesn't count as one of your article. What could be the point for someone who writes the questions and spends the time putting together the article to waste on of their article chances only to give other people in the league a chance at 15 points?
|
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Jul 29, 2009 11:32:13 GMT -5
This always happens when there is a roundtable type of article. I don't see the problem with people who answer the questions getting a 3. It doesn't take long to do, and you get free points for answering some questions. Plus it doesn't count as one of your article. What could be the point for someone who writes the questions and spends the time putting together the article to waste on of their article chances only to give other people in the league a chance at 15 points? your arguement makes absolutely no sense. No this doesn't always happen when there's a roundtable. This roundtable especially everyone provided alot of detailed answers and sure if you put down a bunch of one liners it doesnt take long to do but it took me a good 15 mins to both research and respond questions. I guess if you're trying to say you don't even bother to look at stats when you're answering questions donatello, that's on you but I was pretty thorough on my responses. Not to take away from Tiger because he still has to put everything together still no reason why we all shouldn't get 5. |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Jul 29, 2009 11:32:30 GMT -5
This always happens when there is a roundtable type of article. I don't see the problem with people who answer the questions getting a 3. It doesn't take long to do, and you get free points for answering some questions. Plus it doesn't count as one of your article. What could be the point for someone who writes the questions and spends the time putting together the article to waste on of their article chances only to give other people in the league a chance at 15 points? If it doesn't count as one of your articles and you get a +3 I'm down with that. I didn't know that. |
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Jul 29, 2009 11:42:42 GMT -5
Yeah I should definitely get the full 5 for coming up with the questions and then putting them together. You should try putting all the answers together and getting all the formatting right with names etc too. It takes fucking ages. It takes you guys 10mins to answer the questions.
The way it's always been done is through Ducky's ratings in the past. Usually the answers are judge from 1pt to about 3 or maybe 4pts. No 5 pointers were ever given if I remember correctly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Jul 29, 2009 11:44:25 GMT -5
I just Googled him. I don't live in the States so how the fuck am I supposed to know who he is? It's like me assuming you know who Adrian Chiles is. Despite you purposely being controversial or whatever, most people are just going to interpret it all as you being an asshole. You just compared Jeremy Schaap(more famous because of his legendary father Dick Schaap) to a guy who has less friends on facebook than I do. www.facebook.com/pages/Adrian-Chiles/15992049102The article is in good fun and it shouldn't be read in a mean spirited tone. It's meant to be light hearted reading and to laugh at ourselves. No what I did was compare someone who is famous in the states for being a sports journalist to someone who is famous in the UK for being a sports journalist (and who also presents "The Apprentice: Your Fired" TV show). Stop being a jackass. Hardly anyone at all will know who Jeremy Schaap is in the UK. |
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Jul 29, 2009 11:45:17 GMT -5
Someone hook me up with some points
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Jul 29, 2009 11:52:40 GMT -5
This always happens when there is a roundtable type of article. I don't see the problem with people who answer the questions getting a 3. It doesn't take long to do, and you get free points for answering some questions. Plus it doesn't count as one of your article. What could be the point for someone who writes the questions and spends the time putting together the article to waste on of their article chances only to give other people in the league a chance at 15 points? That is how it has always been. If it doesn't count as one of your articles and you get a +3 I'm down with that. I didn't know that. |
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Jul 29, 2009 12:28:12 GMT -5
You just compared Jeremy Schaap(more famous because of his legendary father Dick Schaap) to a guy who has less friends on facebook than I do. www.facebook.com/pages/Adrian-Chiles/15992049102The article is in good fun and it shouldn't be read in a mean spirited tone. It's meant to be light hearted reading and to laugh at ourselves. No what I did was compare someone who is famous in the states for being a sports journalist to someone who is famous in the UK for being a sports journalist (and who also presents "The Apprentice: Your Fired" TV show). Stop being a jackass. Hardly anyone at all will know who Jeremy Schaap is in the UK. I don't see the need for calling me a jackass. Your tone in this thread has been very spiteful towards me and I don't see where it is coming from. |
|
