|
|
Post by csdude07 on Oct 12, 2009 11:36:32 GMT -5
That is, if I keep my guys and they r healthy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 12, 2009 11:38:54 GMT -5
nah, Chicago gained 39 points on you last year alone...although he is a ways back, if I had to predict a top 5 for next offseason, I would go, Vancouver Chicago Toronto, Minnesota, Seattle nah, I wasn't talking about a Van-Chi gap. Do you see anyone in the top 5 closing in on me Besides the Bulls this year? nope, I don't think so, best shot would be Minny, but my point was I doubt the overall gap widens., I think that the Bulls could pick up 50 |
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on Oct 12, 2009 11:46:35 GMT -5
nah, I wasn't talking about a Van-Chi gap. Do you see anyone in the top 5 closing in on me Besides the Bulls this year? nope, I don't think so, best shot would be Minny, but my point was I doubt the overall gap widens., I think that the Bulls could pick up 50 Only way to measure the overall gap with respect to me would be: gap = my points - league avg. As of now, gap = 847 - 565 = 282 I hope gap > 282 next year  |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Oct 12, 2009 12:40:03 GMT -5
Outstanding article!
|
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Oct 12, 2009 12:43:08 GMT -5
Dang my team was good, but never a title.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Oct 12, 2009 12:49:49 GMT -5
lucky number seven, great work broph
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Oct 12, 2009 13:00:17 GMT -5
YEEEEEEEEEE! NOT LAST! SUCK IT DALLAS!!1!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 12, 2009 13:19:24 GMT -5
nope, I don't think so, best shot would be Minny, but my point was I doubt the overall gap widens., I think that the Bulls could pick up 50 Only way to measure the overall gap with respect to me would be: gap = my points - league avg. As of now, gap = 847 - 565 = 282 I hope gap > 282 next year Actually to be technical you will want your points to be greater than 2.4323 Standard Deviations from the average.cause the average will be greater next year, but not necessarily by a similar scale, because the amount of playoff games decides it. |
|
|
|
Post by SUPERMOTHERFUCKINGSTAR on Oct 12, 2009 13:19:52 GMT -5
This article is AMAZING. Best article i have ever seen in any sim league and i have been in leagues for more than 10 years.
Our cavs arent as low as i thought they would be either. yay! now hopefully we can win some more playoff games this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Oct 12, 2009 13:25:04 GMT -5
Awesome Concept Broph!! Very interesting to see all the little side notes.. I dont see us making the playoffs this season so we could drop a few places.. Its amazing what MJ does!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 12, 2009 13:27:21 GMT -5
This article is AMAZING. Best article i have ever seen in any sim league and i have been in leagues for more than 10 years. Our cavs arent as low as i thought they would be either. yay! now hopefully we can win some more playoff games this year. you know whats funny is I really don't think its that amazing, not because of substance etc, but because in reality, if Proboards wasn't such a Bitch to work with when it comes to setting up tables, its really only about an hour article, cause its relatively easy to get a spreadsheet to do the calculations, and inputting the data is quick, its just formatting that takes such a damn long time. Updating this though would not be a big task, just have to copy the statistics cause everything is already set up, so I'll try to keep it updated yearly from now on... the only thing is I want the division and Conference Champion history, cause teams should get credited for those...My yearly draft recap (not so yearly anymore, have grown somewhat tired of doing it, so if someone wants to recap the 1997 draft be my guest)....is more difficult than this |
|
|
|
Post by crazymike2021 on Oct 12, 2009 13:35:23 GMT -5
great job
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 12, 2009 13:38:26 GMT -5
You know, if and when the history gets updated, this could be tossed into the history and give a year to year view of things.
|
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Oct 12, 2009 13:42:05 GMT -5
This article was pretty good but Franchise power rankings differ because GMs come in and out. I took over a franchise with very little youth and now this team is ready to roll with a good mix of youth and veterans.
How did the Bucks get so many good players if they're ranked so low?
|
|
|
|
Post by Brophdog88 on Oct 12, 2009 13:47:12 GMT -5
This article was pretty good but Franchise power rankings differ because GMs come in and out. I took over a franchise with very little youth and now this team is ready to roll with a good mix of youth and veterans. How did the Bucks get so many good players if they're ranked so low? This is just the Franchise's overall performance, it is not a league power ranking as teams stand currently, but who is the best overall since the league started. Current teams do not matter, because next year when updated, the new standings will have teams who are good trending upwards, and poor teams trending downwards. The Bucks were terrible for a long time at the beginning of the league, but now they have a good team so they should be climbing. |
|
