|
Post by ashes on Nov 16, 2009 14:55:42 GMT -5
does anybody really sit and read this whole thing? How do you have time in the day to read this? Took me a solid 5 minutes. I'm really liking what you've brought to this league so far.
|
|
|
Post by mtg on Nov 16, 2009 15:00:23 GMT -5
fire him and gimme the team
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Nov 16, 2009 15:00:51 GMT -5
fire him and give him the team
|
|
|
Post by sagapolutele50 on Nov 16, 2009 15:08:36 GMT -5
Nice read, good to get a gauge on what other GMs are thinking!!
|
|
|
Post by tEnSiXniNe on Nov 16, 2009 15:08:59 GMT -5
Who did I get that elite player from again? I cant remember. Nub sauce.
|
|
|
Post by tEnSiXniNe on Nov 16, 2009 15:10:23 GMT -5
does anybody really sit and read this whole thing? How do you have time in the day to read this? Took me a solid 5 minutes. I'm really liking what you've brought to this league so far. bo ho? If you dont like it replace me IDGAF. So because I dont want to read GM's random thoughts on the league you dont like me here? I update my DC I send out PM's I do all the shit a GM does. Sorry I dont care what Martinez thinks about other teams.
|
|
|
Post by mtg on Nov 16, 2009 15:10:57 GMT -5
Who tried trading KG for Z. Randolph again? I can't remember.
|
|
|
Post by mtg on Nov 16, 2009 15:11:31 GMT -5
Nub sauce
|
|
|
Post by tEnSiXniNe on Nov 16, 2009 15:14:06 GMT -5
Who tried trading KG for Z. Randolph again? I can't remember. yep that was the trade, Kevin Garnett for Z Bo straight up. You know so much about this league I dont understand why you were fired.
|
|
|
Post by Tigertecz on Nov 16, 2009 15:16:16 GMT -5
that makes absolutely no sense though... someone who is "overrated" does not get labeled as the best GM that's like two things that negate each other. How do I break it down for Marty.... 3 championships = best. However, he would not be as successful if he didn't have Preira. You can't say that though because that's like saying the real life Bulls wouldn't have had all those rings if they didn't have Jordan, or you wouldn't have had your ring if you didn't have Shaq. Just because a player is the best player on the team doesn't mean that the team's success can't be discounted for him being there. It's a ridiculous argument.
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Nov 16, 2009 15:19:34 GMT -5
How do I break it down for Marty.... 3 championships = best. However, he would not be as successful if he didn't have Preira. You can't say that though because that's like saying the real life Bulls wouldn't have had all those rings if they didn't have Jordan, or you wouldn't have had your ring if you didn't have Shaq. Just because a player is the best player on the team doesn't mean that the team's success can't be discounted for him being there. It's a ridiculous argument. It still makes zero sense to me. Yeah, let's rank a guy #1 but still call him overrated.
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on Nov 16, 2009 15:41:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on Nov 16, 2009 15:42:33 GMT -5
How do I break it down for Marty.... 3 championships = best. However, he would not be as successful if he didn't have Preira. You can't say that though because that's like saying the real life Bulls wouldn't have had all those rings if they didn't have Jordan, or you wouldn't have had your ring if you didn't have Shaq. Just because a player is the best player on the team doesn't mean that the team's success can't be discounted for him being there. It's a ridiculous argument. I disagree.
|
|
|
Post by csdude07 on Nov 16, 2009 15:42:49 GMT -5
You can't say that though because that's like saying the real life Bulls wouldn't have had all those rings if they didn't have Jordan, or you wouldn't have had your ring if you didn't have Shaq. Just because a player is the best player on the team doesn't mean that the team's success can't be discounted for him being there. It's a ridiculous argument. It still makes zero sense to me. not surprised
|
|
|
Post by tmaczdaddy on Nov 16, 2009 16:23:01 GMT -5
Michael Jordan is the best player of all time!!!!!!!!!!!
But he is overrated.
|
|