|
Post by ashes on Feb 8, 2010 19:16:36 GMT -5
Are no longer allowed. It's like I'm dealing with fucking children.
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Feb 8, 2010 19:22:51 GMT -5
The following are cancelled: ATL owe a 1st to ORL by 2006 ATL owe a 1st to LAC by 2006 DET owe a 1st to MIN by 2008 DAL owe a 1st to HOU by 2008 ORL owe a 1st to DET by 2008 ORL owe a 1st to DET by 2009 MIL owe a top 20 1st to WAS by 2009 DET owe a 1st to GSW by 2009 MIL owe a 1st to DEN by 2009 MIL owe a 1st to DEN in or before 2009 NYK owe a 1st to LAC by 2009 DEN owe a 1st to ATL by 2009 VAN owe a 1st to WAS by 2010 DEN owe a 1st to WAS by 2012
I'll figure out some sort of compensation for you guys.
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Feb 8, 2010 19:23:36 GMT -5
I don't owe that pick to sac anymore. I paid it out this past draft.
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Feb 8, 2010 19:24:25 GMT -5
k
|
|
|
Post by martinez on Feb 8, 2010 19:25:58 GMT -5
Yea he did
|
|
|
Post by Contract Year on Feb 8, 2010 19:26:03 GMT -5
Good
|
|
|
Post by princemaharajah on Feb 8, 2010 19:26:59 GMT -5
Can we give this rule a name like we did with signing the best player from free agency?
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Feb 8, 2010 19:28:57 GMT -5
Ya the shaunkol rule
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on Feb 8, 2010 19:29:37 GMT -5
how about just a +5 to a player or something
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Feb 8, 2010 19:30:20 GMT -5
Some people don't have a player they want to get a +5 to right now though.
Maybe it can be saved and they can use it when they want to.
|
|
|
Post by shaunkol on Feb 8, 2010 19:39:14 GMT -5
haha, im the one who has always honored owed 1sts!! i did nothing wrong in the owed 1st process.
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Feb 8, 2010 22:21:19 GMT -5
+5 > #29 pick
|
|
|
Post by cliff "woo" harris on Feb 8, 2010 22:25:58 GMT -5
I'd rather have the pick, but whatever +5 is ok..
|
|
|
Post by Kruwaukee on Feb 8, 2010 22:28:22 GMT -5
I think +3 is more along the lines
|
|
|
Post by mops on Feb 8, 2010 23:16:33 GMT -5
I'd rather have the pick, but whatever +5 is ok..
|
|