|
|
Post by csdude07 on Mar 8, 2009 0:17:57 GMT -5
Grizzlies send:
Dominique Wilkins
Ricky Pierce
Hornets send:
Vancouver 1993 1st
Blue Edwards
Brian Shaw
I send two excellent players, but I really need youth. I also get expiring contracts which help.
|
|
|
|
Post by DB on Mar 8, 2009 1:21:41 GMT -5
hahah really? you turn down 3 firsts and I offered better players in return. wow what a joke. Who cares if he gets his own first back deal still is shitty.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Mar 8, 2009 1:28:11 GMT -5
CS.... I was offering a much better deal. Two firsts, Spree, etc. I don't care if you get your own first back. This is pure rape.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Mar 8, 2009 1:28:45 GMT -5
Shit, you give up Pierce too?
Can this get reviewed? Seriously?
I mean, that package alone for Nique in and of itself is bad. But giving up Pierce too?!?!?!?!
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 8, 2009 1:54:13 GMT -5
Deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 8, 2009 1:54:56 GMT -5
I get two very good players. They dont fit in perfectly with the age group of guys I was looking for, but it works for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by House on Mar 8, 2009 1:56:11 GMT -5
*snorts* Of course it works for you. You win the title.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 8, 2009 1:58:26 GMT -5
*snorts* Of course it works for you. You win the title. I really wanted both players. I wouldn't have done it just for Nique. Pierce is a great offensive player, but his defense is pretty bad. Nique is awesome, but 32 and obviously on the downside. Grizz have a legit shot at Shaq now. If it gets reversed, whatever. No biggie. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 8, 2009 2:10:11 GMT -5
CS.... I was offering a much better deal. Two firsts, Spree, etc. I don't care if you get your own first back. This is pure rape. I probably wouldve done Pierce and Spre for Edwards and the VAN pick. If in fact this deal gets vetoed, maybe we can work something out to help the Grizz franchise. |
|
|
|
Post by House on Mar 8, 2009 2:10:32 GMT -5
I mean, to be honest, the reason it really SHOULD be vetoed is because of the other offers he was getting were far > than getting his pick back and no one else. ESPECIALLY with what he was getting.
Also, the package still just plain sucks here. If he was getting a young stud and his pick back (you have plenty of young studs), then wham, it's alright for him, and I wouldn't complain, I'd go cry in the corner.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 8, 2009 2:11:41 GMT -5
I mean, to be honest, the reason it really SHOULD be vetoed is because of the other offers he was getting were far > than getting his pick back and no one else. ESPECIALLY with what he was getting. Also, the package still just plain sucks here. If he was getting a young stud and his pick back (you have plenty of young studs), then wham, it's alright for him, and I wouldn't complain, I'd go cry in the corner. Why would I give a young stud though? That doesnt make sense. This deal wouldnt have happened unless it was exactly what was posted. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 8, 2009 2:11:47 GMT -5
I mean, to be honest, the reason it really SHOULD be vetoed is because of the other offers he was getting were far > than getting his pick back and no one else. ESPECIALLY with what he was getting. Also, the package still just plain sucks here. If he was getting a young stud and his pick back (you have plenty of young studs), then wham, it's alright for him, and I wouldn't complain, I'd go cry in the corner. I'd rather have the chance at Shaq/Webber/Penny than Sprewell, lol. |
|
|
|
Post by ashes on Mar 8, 2009 2:12:34 GMT -5
And if you think he'd get a young stud + a pick, you're crazy. Do you know the meaning of leverage?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 8, 2009 2:13:25 GMT -5
I mean, to be honest, the reason it really SHOULD be vetoed is because of the other offers he was getting were far > than getting his pick back and no one else. ESPECIALLY with what he was getting. Also, the package still just plain sucks here. If he was getting a young stud and his pick back (you have plenty of young studs), then wham, it's alright for him, and I wouldn't complain, I'd go cry in the corner. I'd rather have the chance at Shaq/Webber/Penny than Sprewell, lol. I think this is a little bit of sour grapes. I mean it sucks to have your offer beat. What are the chances that Dans picks were his own? And he's a good GM. I mean 3 bad firsts isn't better then 1 of your own 1sts. Deals good. Those that are complaining can STFU and GTFO. |
|
|
|
Post by Spencer on Mar 8, 2009 2:14:24 GMT -5
And if you think he'd get a young stud + a pick, you're crazy. Do you know the meaning of leverage? I told him straight up, no wiggle room. I think his pick is lotto with Nique. Id rather have a lotto pick with my youth then just Nique. I needed Pierce in the deal. |
|
